Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Clothing-Change Person Re-Identification via Semantic Feature Attribution
Keywords:
explainable AI, person re-identification, clothing change, semantic attribution, surveillance systems, fairness, infrastructureAbstract
Clothing-change person re-identification (CC-ReID) poses a formidable challenge for surveillance systems, as individuals deliberately or incidentally alter their appearance, rendering traditional appearance-based matching unreliable. While deep learning models have achieved considerable accuracy in controlled benchmarks, their opacity undermines trust, accountability, and operational safety in high-stakes deployments such as law enforcement and border control. This paper presents a system-level investigation into explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) for CC-ReID through the lens of semantic feature attribution. We argue that the path toward trustworthy CC-ReID lies not in isolated algorithmic post-hoc explanation but in architecting inherently interpretable attribution pipelines that expose how models associate identity across clothing boundaries. The paper dissects the structural trade-offs among global and local explanation modalities, the integration of attention and part-based feature decoupling as attribution sources, and the infrastructure requirements for real-time explainability at scale. A comprehensive analysis is provided of how semantic attribution surfaces robustness vulnerabilities, enables fairness audits across demographic subgroups, and informs governance frameworks for biometric surveillance. We further examine the deployment continuum from centralized cloud analytics to privacy-preserving edge inference, discussing energy sustainability and the tension between model complexity and explanatory fidelity. By synthesizing perspectives from computer vision, systems engineering, and regulatory policy, this work offers a blueprint for next-generation CC-ReID platforms where explanation is not an add-on but a fundamental design constraint. The paper concludes with an agenda for open benchmarking, standardized attribution validation, and cross-disciplinary collaboration to align technical capability with societal values.
References
1. Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). “Why should I trust you?” Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1135–1144.
2. Selvaraju, R. R., Cogswell, M., Das, A., Vedantam, R., Parikh, D., & Batra, D. (2017). Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 618–626.
3. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 4765–4774.
4. Arrieta, A. B., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., ... & Herrera, F. (2020). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115.
5. Yang, Q., Wu, A., & Zheng, W. S. (2019). Person re-identification by contour sketch under moderate clothing change. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 42(9), 2029–2043.
6. Ding, Y., Wang, X., Yuan, H., Qu, M., & Jian, X. (2025). Decoupling feature-driven and multimodal fusion attention for clothing-changing person re-identification. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58(8), 241.
7. Li, Y., Chen, Y., Wang, F., & Zheng, W. S. (2020). Clothes-changing person re-identification with RGB feature learning and clothes-based data augmentation. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 3543–3549.
8. Wan, F., Wu, Y., Tian, C., & Xiao, J. (2020). Clothes changing person re-identification via clothing-independent feature learning. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 31(8), 3164–3177.
9. Gu, X., Chang, H., Ma, B., & Chen, X. (2022). Cloth-changing person re-identification with multi-modality. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 17, 2499–2512.
10. Zheng, L., Shen, L., Tian, L., Wang, S., Wang, J., & Tian, Q. (2015). Scalable person re-identification: A benchmark. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 1116–1124.
11. Xiang, T., & Gong, S. (2021). The role of context in object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(2), 137–149.
12. Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608.
13. Miller, T. (2019). Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artificial Intelligence, 267, 1–38.
14. European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). COM/2021/206 final.
15. Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), 206–215.
16. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35.
17. Al-Rubaie, M., & Chang, J. M. (2019). Privacy-preserving machine learning: Threats and solutions. IEEE Security & Privacy, 17(2), 49–58.
18. Chen, T., Guestrin, C., & Strobel, M. (2020). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(12), 742–750.
19. Lipton, Z. C. (2018). The mythos of model interpretability. Communications of the ACM, 61(10), 36–43.
20. Brundage, M., Avin, S., Clark, J., Toner, H., Eckersley, P., Garfinkel, B., ... & Amodei, D. (2018). The malicious use of artificial intelligence: Forecasting, prevention, and mitigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.07228.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Engineering and Systems

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.