Intelligent Resource Scheduling for Hybrid Optical-Electrical Interconnects in Cloud Computing Infrastructure

Authors

  • Michal Wodka Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. Author
  • Amruta Ravel Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. Author
  • Giuliana Agnesi Department of Computer Science, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA. Author
  • Larissa Sussebier Department of Computer Science, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA. Author

Keywords:

hybrid optical-electrical interconnects; cloud computing; resource scheduling; data center networks; optical switching; sustainability; governance; robustness

Abstract

Cloud computing infrastructure increasingly depends on interconnect fabrics that can sustain high bandwidth, low latency, and predictable energy behavior across heterogeneous workloads. Hybrid optical-electrical interconnects offer a promising architectural path because they combine the maturity, granularity, and buffering advantages of electrical switching with the bandwidth density, distance reach, and energy efficiency of optical communication. However, the coexistence of electrical and optical resources creates complex scheduling problems that cannot be reduced to conventional packet routing or virtual machine placement. This paper examines intelligent resource scheduling for hybrid optical-electrical interconnects from a system-level and socio-technical perspective. It argues that effective schedulers must coordinate workload characterization, topology awareness, optical circuit setup, electrical packet buffering, failure recovery, fairness constraints, and sustainability objectives. The analysis discusses structural trade-offs among reconfiguration latency, port count, spectrum assignment, and utilization, and it considers how machine learning and optimization-based control can operate within governance boundaries that protect tenant autonomy and network stability. The paper also explores deployment pathways, infrastructure economics, robustness under correlated failures, and policy implications for multi-tenant cloud environments. The central conclusion is that hybrid optical-electrical scheduling should be understood as an infrastructure governance problem as much as an algorithmic one. Sustainable and equitable cloud systems will require schedulers that can reason across time scales, ownership boundaries, energy sources, and service-level commitments while remaining explainable to operators, regulators, and tenants.

References

1. Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A. D., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., Lee, G., Patterson, D., Rabkin, A., Stoica, I., & Zaharia, M. (2010). A view of cloud computing. Communications of the ACM, 53(4), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/1721654.1721672

2. Barroso, L. A., Clidaras, J., & Hölzle, U. (2013). The datacenter as a computer: An introduction to the design of warehouse-scale machines (2nd ed.). Morgan & Claypool. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00516ED2V01Y201306CAC024

3. Greenberg, A., Hamilton, J., Maltz, D. A., & Patel, P. (2008). The cost of a cloud: Research problems in data center networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 39(1), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/1496091.1496103

4. Al-Fares, M., Loukissas, A., & Vahdat, A. (2008). A scalable, commodity data center network architecture. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(4), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1145/1402958.1402967

5. Kachris, C., & Tomkos, I. (2012). A survey on optical interconnects for data centers. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 14(4), 1021–1036. https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2011.122111.00069

6. Farrington, N., Porter, G., Radhakrishnan, S., Bazzaz, H. H., Subramanya, V., Fainman, Y., Papen, G., & Vahdat, A. (2010). Helios: A hybrid electrical/optical switch architecture for modular data centers. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 40(4), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1145/1851182.1851223

7. Chen, K., Singla, A., Singh, A., Ramachandran, K., Xu, L., Zhang, Y., Wen, X., & Chen, Y. (2013). OSA: An optical switching architecture for data center networks with unprecedented flexibility. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 22(2), 498–511. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNET.2013.2253120

8. Zhou, Zichuan, et al. "Low-latency wavelength-switched clock-synchronized intra-data center interconnects enabled by hollow core fiber." Optics Express 31.15 (2023): 24739-24748.

9. Bazzaz, H. H., Tewari, M., Wang, G., Porter, G., Ng, T. S., Andersen, D. G., Kaminsky, M., Kozuch, M. A., & Vahdat, A. (2013). Switching the optical divide: Fundamental challenges for hybrid electrical/optical datacenter networks. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/2523616.2523618

10. Kachris, C., Kanonakis, K., & Tomkos, I. (2013). Optical interconnection networks in data centers: Recent trends and future challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(9), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2013.6588648

11. Shalf, J. (2020). The future of computing beyond Moore's Law. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 378(2166), 20190061. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0061

12. Baliga, J., Ayre, R. W. A., Hinton, K., & Tucker, R. S. (2011). Green cloud computing: Balancing energy in processing, storage, and transport. Proceedings of the IEEE, 99(1), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2010.2060451

13. Kliazovich, D., Bouvry, P., & Khan, S. U. (2012). GreenCloud: A packet-level simulator of energy-aware cloud computing data centers. The Journal of Supercomputing, 62(3), 1263–1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-010-0504-1

14. Heller, B., Seetharaman, S., Mahadevan, P., Yiakoumis, Y., Sharma, P., Banerjee, S., & McKeown, N. (2010). ElasticTree: Saving energy in data center networks. Proceedings of the 7th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, 249–264.

15. Buyya, R., Yeo, C. S., Venugopal, S., Broberg, J., & Brandic, I. (2009). Cloud computing and emerging IT platforms: Vision, hype, and reality for delivering computing as the 5th utility. Future Generation Computer Systems, 25(6), 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2008.12.001

16. Zhang, Q., Cheng, L., & Boutaba, R. (2010). Cloud computing: State-of-the-art and research challenges. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 1(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13174-010-0007-6

17. Georgakilas, K., Tzanakaki, A., Anastasopoulos, M., & Simeonidou, D. (2016). Converged optical network and data center virtual infrastructure planning. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 8(7), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.8.000459

18. Bari, M. F., Boutaba, R., Esteves, R., Granville, L. Z., Podlesny, M., Rabbani, M. G., Zhang, Q., & Zhani, M. F. (2013). Data center network virtualization: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15(2), 909–928. https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2012.090512.00043

19. Gai, K., Qiu, M., Zhao, H., & Tao, L. (2016). Dynamic energy-aware cloudlet-based mobile cloud computing model for green computing. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 59, 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2015.05.016

20. Cisco. (2023). Cisco annual internet report (2018–2023) white paper. Cisco. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/executive-perspectives/annual-internet-report/white-paper-c11-741490.html

Downloads

Published

2026-09-03

How to Cite

Intelligent Resource Scheduling for Hybrid Optical-Electrical Interconnects in Cloud Computing Infrastructure. (2026). International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Engineering and Systems, 1(2). https://ijaies.org/index.php/home/article/view/208