Energy-Efficient Post-Training of End-to-End Autonomous Driving Models for Edge AI Deployment

Authors

  • Nicola Brookes Department of Computer Science, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA. Author
  • Feargal McLeese Department of Computer Science, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA. Author
  • Encarnita Zaragoza Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA. Author
  • Heinz-Walter Misicher School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA. Author

Keywords:

energy-efficient post-training; end-to-end autonomous driving; edge AI; sustainable machine learning; model adaptation; federated learning; robustness; fairness; automotive governance; lifecycle carbon

Abstract

End-to-end autonomous driving models increasingly combine perception, prediction, planning, and control in a single learned pipeline. While this architecture reduces engineering interfaces, it also produces large multimodal networks whose adaptation after initial training can be costly. Edge deployment in vehicles adds stringent constraints: limited compute, memory, thermal headroom, energy budgets, and long-lived safety validation. This paper examines energy-efficient post-training as a socio-technical systems problem rather than a narrow optimization technique. It analyzes how fine-tuning, parameter-efficient adaptation, quantization-aware tuning, distillation, and federated post-training interact with automotive operating domains, fleet heterogeneity, regulatory oversight, and lifecycle carbon. The central argument is that energy efficiency in post-training cannot be achieved solely by compressing models; it requires coordinated choices across data curation, architecture, update frequency, over-the-air infrastructure, safety assurance, and governance. We discuss structural trade-offs among adaptation quality, robustness, fairness, and energy use, and we outline deployment pathways that treat post-training as a governed lifecycle process. Particular attention is given to edge AI constraints, carbon accounting, robust long-tail behavior, and equitable performance across regions and populations. The paper concludes with a research agenda for measurement, carbon-aware scheduling, reproducible benchmarks, and policy instruments that align efficient post-training with public safety and sustainability goals.

References

1. Chen, C., Seff, A., Kornhauser, A., & Xiao, J. (2015). DeepDriving: Learning affordance for direct perception in autonomous driving. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2722–2730.

2. Codevilla, F., Müller, M., López, A., Koltun, V., & Dosovitskiy, A. (2018). End-to-end driving via conditional imitation learning. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 4693–4700). IEEE.

3. Bojarski, M., Del Testa, D., Dworakowski, D., Firner, B., Flepp, B., Goyal, P., ... Zieba, K. (2016). End to end learning for self-driving cars. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.07316.

4. Howard, A. G., Zhu, M., Chen, B., Kalenichenko, D., Wang, W., Weyand, T., ... Adam, H. (2017). MobileNets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861.

5. Han, S., Mao, H., & Dally, W. J. (2016). Deep compression: Compressing deep neural networks with pruning, trained quantization and Huffman coding. In 4th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).

6. Jacob, B., Kligys, S., Chen, B., Zhu, M., Tang, M., Howard, A., ... Kalenichenko, D. (2018). Quantization and training of neural networks for efficient integer-arithmetic-only inference. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 2704–2713).

7. Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., & Dean, J. (2015). Distilling the knowledge in a neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531.

8. Hu, E. J., Shen, Y., Wallis, P., Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, S., ... Chen, W. (2022). LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. In International Conference on Learning Representations.

9. Dettmers, T., Pagnoni, A., Holtzman, A., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2023). QLoRA: Efficient finetuning of quantized LLMs. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 36).

10. McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & Arcas, B. A. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (pp. 1273–1282).

11. Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A. N., ... Zhao, S. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1–2), 1–210.

12. Kalra, N., & Paddock, S. M. (2016). Driving to safety: How many miles of driving would it take to demonstrate autonomous vehicle reliability? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, 182–193.

13. Sculley, D., Holt, G., Golovin, D., Davydov, E., Phillips, T., Ebner, D., ... Dennison, D. (2015). Hidden technical debt in machine learning systems. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 28).

14. Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019). Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 3645–3650).

15. Patterson, D., Gonzalez, J., Le, Q., Liang, C., Munguia, L. M., Rothchild, D., ... Dean, J. (2021). Carbon emissions and large neural network training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.10350.

16. Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P., Schulman, J., & Mané, D. (2016). Concrete problems in AI safety. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06565.

17. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35.

18. Shalev-Shwartz, S., Shammah, S., & Shashua, A. (2017). On a formal model of safe and scalable self-driving cars. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.06374.

19. Czarnecki, K. (2018). Operational design domain for automated driving systems: Taxonomy and definitions. Waterloo Intelligent Systems Engineering Lab.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-04 — Updated on 2026-10-19

How to Cite

Energy-Efficient Post-Training of End-to-End Autonomous Driving Models for Edge AI Deployment. (2026). International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Engineering and Systems, 1(2). https://ijaies.org/index.php/home/article/view/206