Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Dough Rheological Properties Under Repeated Freeze–Thaw Conditions

Authors

  • Gerti Fliegner Department of Computer Science, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA. Author
  • Danique Karels School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA. Author
  • Wazir Johal Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. Author
  • Leia Hogberg Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA. Author

Keywords:

dough rheology; freeze–thaw cycles; deep learning; food systems; uncertainty quantification; infrastructure governance

Abstract

Repeated freeze–thaw conditions impose cumulative structural and rheological changes on dough, altering its viscoelastic behavior, water distribution, gluten network integrity, and fermentation performance. Predicting these changes is difficult because dough is a heterogeneous, history-dependent material whose behavior emerges from coupled biochemical, colloidal, and mechanical processes. This paper examines deep learning-based prediction of dough rheological properties under repeated freeze–thaw cycles from a system-level perspective. It synthesizes literature on frozen dough science, rheological measurement, machine learning architectures, deployment infrastructure, governance, and sustainability. The discussion emphasizes that predictive performance depends not only on model selection but also on sensing quality, experimental design, metadata discipline, uncertainty quantification, and operational integration. Deep learning can combine rheometric time series, imaging, spectroscopy, thermal data, and formulation records, yet such multimodal systems introduce trade-offs in cost, latency, interpretability, and maintainability. The paper argues for hybrid architectures that embed physical priors while retaining representation learning capacity, supported by calibrated uncertainty estimates and transparent documentation. It further considers fairness across flour varieties, regional supply chains, and small-scale bakeries, as well as policy implications for food safety, labeling, data sharing, and energy use. Case illustrations from industrial freezing, artisanal production, cloud kitchens, and humanitarian food systems demonstrate that deployment contexts shape both model requirements and social consequences. The conclusion proposes a research agenda centered on robust benchmarks, causal inference, edge-to-cloud orchestration, and equitable governance for intelligent frozen dough systems.

References

1. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539

2. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.

3. Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735

4. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 5998–6008.

5. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019). Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045

6. Kendall, A., & Gal, Y. (2017). What uncertainties do we need in Bayesian deep learning for computer vision? Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 5574–5584.

7. Guo, C., Pleiss, G., Sun, Y., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017). On calibration of modern neural networks. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, 70, 1321–1330.

8. Sculley, D., Holt, G., Golovin, D., Davydov, E., Phillips, T., Ebner, D., Chaudhary, V., Young, M., Crespo, J.-F., & Dennison, D. (2015). Hidden technical debt in machine learning systems. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 28, 2503–2511.

9. Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L., Hutchinson, B., Spitzer, E., Raji, I. D., & Gebru, T. (2019). Model cards for model reporting. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287596

10. Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Daumé III, H., & Crawford, K. (2021). Datasheets for datasets. Communications of the ACM, 64(12), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1145/3458723

11. Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019). Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3645–3650. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1355

12. Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

13. Slade, L., & Levine, H. (1991). Beyond water activity: Recent advances based on an alternative approach to the assessment of food quality and safety. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 30(2–3), 115–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408399109527543

14. Baier-Schenk, A., Handschin, S., von Schönau, M., Bittermann, A. G., Báez, L., & Conde-Petit, B. (2005). In situ observation of the freezing process in wheat dough by confocal laser scanning microscopy: Formation of ice crystals and changes in the gluten network. Journal of Cereal Science, 42(2), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2005.04.001

15. Räsänen, J., Blanshard, J. M. V., Mitchell, J. R., Derbyshire, W., & Autio, K. (1998). Properties of frozen wheat doughs at subzero temperatures. Journal of Cereal Science, 28(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcrs.1997.0159

16. Kenny, S., Wehrle, K., Auty, M. A. E., & Arendt, E. K. (2000). Influence of sodium caseinate and whey protein on baking properties and rheology of frozen dough. Cereal Chemistry, 77(3), 365–370. https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM.2000.77.3.365

17. Zhou, L., Zhang, C., Liu, F., Qiu, Z., & He, Y. (2019). Application of deep learning in food: A review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 18(6), 1793–1811. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12492

18. Zhang, T., Fang, J. Q., Wang, P. P., & Chen, C. (2026). Structural basis of the cryoprotective sol-gel transition in a Phyllanthus emblica L. polysaccharide fraction for frozen dough applications. Food Hydrocolloids, 112842.

19. Kamilaris, A., & Prenafeta-Boldú, F. X. (2018). Deep learning in agriculture: A survey. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 147, 70–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.02.016

20. Zhu, L., Spachos, P., Pensini, E., & Plataniotis, K. N. (2021). Deep learning and machine vision for food processing: A survey. Current Research in Food Science, 4, 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2021.03.009

Downloads

Published

2026-08-23

How to Cite

Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Dough Rheological Properties Under Repeated Freeze–Thaw Conditions. (2026). International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Engineering and Systems, 1(2). https://ijaies.org/index.php/home/article/view/201