Energy-Efficient Secure Inference for Neural Networks on Edge Devices

Authors

  • Mathijs van Haeften School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA. Author
  • Abhimanyu Lalla Department of Computer Science, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA. Author
  • Leopoldo Puccini School of Computing, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA. Author
  • Kirstin Leen Department of Computer Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA. Author

Keywords:

energy-efficient secure inference, edge computing, privacy-preserving machine learning, two-party computation, homomorphic encryption, system architecture, sustainability, governance

Abstract

Secure inference for neural networks on edge devices sits at the intersection of cryptographic protection, constrained computation, and operational sustainability. Edge devices increasingly perform or assist with inference because they reduce latency, preserve local context, and lessen dependence on centralized cloud infrastructure. Yet privacy-preserving mechanisms such as homomorphic encryption, secure multi-party computation, and trusted execution environments impose substantial energy, memory, and communication costs. This paper examines the system-level trade-offs that shape energy-efficient secure inference, with attention to architecture, hardware heterogeneity, deployment governance, robustness, fairness, and policy. It argues that secure inference should not be treated as a standalone cryptographic layer but as a socio-technical infrastructure problem. The analysis considers how model compression, quantization, protocol design, and edge-cloud partitioning interact with security guarantees and energy budgets. It also explores how measurement practices, supply chains, standards, and regulatory expectations influence adoption. The paper concludes that durable progress requires co-design across algorithms, protocols, hardware, and institutions, and that energy efficiency must be evaluated alongside privacy, accuracy, resilience, and equity rather than as a substitute for them.

References

1. Satyanarayanan, M. (2017). The emergence of edge computing. Computer, 50(1), 30-39. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2017.9

2. Alrawais, A., Alhothaily, A., Hu, C., & Cheng, X. (2017). Fog computing for the Internet of Things: Security and privacy issues. IEEE Internet Computing, 21(2), 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2017.37

3. Zhang, C., Patras, P., & Haddadi, H. (2019). Deep learning in mobile and wireless networking: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 21(3), 2224-2287. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2019.2904897

4. Howard, A. G., Zhu, M., Chen, B., Kalenichenko, D., Wang, W., Weyand, T., Andreetto, M., & Adam, H. (2017). MobileNets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.04861

5. Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A., & Chen, L. C. (2018). MobileNetV2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 4510-4520. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474

6. Han, S., Mao, H., & Dally, W. J. (2016). Deep compression: Compressing deep neural networks with pruning, trained quantization and Huffman coding. International Conference on Learning Representations.

7. Jacob, B., Kligys, S., Chen, B., Zhu, M., Tang, M., Howard, A., Adam, H., & Kalenichenko, D. (2018). Quantization and training of neural networks for efficient integer-arithmetic-only inference. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2704-2713. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00286

8. Yao, A. C. C. (1986). How to generate and exchange secrets. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 162-167. https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1986.25

9. Goldreich, O., Micali, S., & Wigderson, A. (1987). How to play any mental game. Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 218-229. https://doi.org/10.1145/28395.28420

10. Gentry, C. (2009). Fully homomorphic encryption using ideal lattices. Proceedings of the 41st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 169-178. https://doi.org/10.1145/1536414.1536440

11. Gilad-Bachrach, R., Dowlin, N., Laine, K., Lauter, K., Naehrig, M., & Wernsing, J. (2016). CryptoNets: Applying neural networks to encrypted data with high throughput and accuracy. International Conference on Machine Learning, 201-210.

12. Mohassel, P., & Zhang, Y. (2017). SecureML: A system for scalable privacy-preserving machine learning. 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 19-38. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2017.12

13. Liu, J., Juuti, M., Lu, Y., & Asokan, N. (2017). Oblivious neural network predictions via MiniONN transformations. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 619-631. https://doi.org/10.1145/3133956.3134056

14. Juvekar, C., Vaikuntanathan, V., & Chandrakasan, A. (2018). GAZELLE: A low latency framework for secure neural network inference. Proceedings of the 27th USENIX Security Symposium, 1651-1669.

15. Peng, H., Zhou, S., Luo, Y., Xu, N., Duan, S., Ran, R., ... & Ding, C. (2023). Rrnet: Towards relu-reduced neural network for two-party computation based private inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02292.

16. Knott, B., Venkataraman, S., Hannun, A., Sengupta, S., & van der Maaten, L. (2021). CrypTen: Secure multi-party computation meets machine learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34.

17. Mohassel, P., & Rindal, P. (2018). ABY3: A mixed protocol framework for machine learning. Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1145/3243734.3243760

18. Rathee, D., Rathee, M., Kumar, N., Chandran, P., Gupta, A., Rastogi, A., & Sharma, R. (2020). CrypTFlow2: Practical 2-party secure inference. Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 325-342. https://doi.org/10.1145/3372297.3417274

19. McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & y Arcas, B. A. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 1273-1282.

20. Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019). Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 3645-3650. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1355

21. Schwartz, R., Dodge, J., Smith, N. A., & Etzioni, O. (2020). Green AI. Communications of the ACM, 63(12), 54-63. https://doi.org/10.1145/3381831

22. Wu, C. J., Brooks, D., Chen, K., Chen, D., Choudhury, S., Dukhan, M., ... & Zhang, P. (2019). Machine learning at Facebook: Understanding inference at the edge. 2019 IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture, 331-344. https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCA.2019.00048

Downloads

Published

2026-08-29

How to Cite

Energy-Efficient Secure Inference for Neural Networks on Edge Devices. (2026). International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Engineering and Systems, 1(2). https://ijaies.org/index.php/home/article/view/187