Self-Supervised Representation Learning for Large-Scale Vehicle Motion Prediction

Authors

  • Oswin Hentschel Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA. Author

Keywords:

self-supervised learning; vehicle motion prediction; large-scale systems; representation learning; autonomous driving; data curation; robustness; governance; sustainability

Abstract

Large-scale vehicle motion prediction has become a central problem for autonomous driving, intelligent transportation, and safety-critical urban mobility. The field increasingly depends on representation learning that can exploit massive unlabeled or weakly labeled trajectory corpora without requiring exhaustive manual annotation. This paper examines self-supervised representation learning as a system-level strategy for vehicle motion prediction at scale. It argues that the principal challenges are not only model architecture but also data infrastructure, curation, evaluation, deployment, governance, robustness, fairness, and long-term sustainability. Beginning from conceptual foundations in transformer architectures, masked modeling, contrastive learning, and redundancy reduction, the discussion develops an integrated view of how self-supervised objectives can structure multi-agent interaction, map context, temporal dependency, and uncertainty. The paper then analyzes architectural trade-offs among centralized, hierarchical, and scene-centric representations, and it considers how data pipelines, benchmark design, and density-balanced evaluation shape model behavior. Particular attention is given to the tension between generalization and operational reliability, because motion prediction systems must perform under distribution shift, sensor degradation, edge cases, and heterogeneous traffic norms. The paper further assesses deployment constraints involving latency, memory, fleet-scale inference, and continuous learning, as well as sustainability concerns related to compute, data storage, and lifecycle maintenance. Fairness and policy implications are treated as first-order engineering concerns rather than external constraints, especially where predictive systems allocate risk across pedestrians, cyclists, and underserved communities. Through case illustrations from autonomous driving datasets and cross-domain comparisons with language and vision pretraining, the paper outlines a research agenda for self-supervised motion prediction that is technically rigorous, institutionally accountable, and socially legible. The conclusion emphasizes that scalable representation learning must be embedded within broader socio-technical infrastructures if it is to support dependable vehicle motion prediction.

References

1. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 5998-6008).

2. Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT (pp. 4171-4186).

3. He, K., Fan, H., Wu, Y., Xie, S., & Girshick, R. (2020). Momentum contrast for unsupervised visual representation learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 9729-9738).

4. Chen, T., Kornblith, S., Norouzi, M., & Hinton, G. (2020). A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 1597-1607).

5. Grill, J.-B., Strub, F., Altché, F., Tallec, C., Richemond, P. H., Buchatskaya, E., ... Valko, M. (2020). Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 21271-21284).

6. Bardes, A., Ponce, J., & LeCun, Y. (2022). VICReg: Variance-invariance-covariance regularization for self-supervised learning. In International Conference on Learning Representations.

7. Alahi, A., Goel, K., Ramanathan, V., Robicquet, A., Fei-Fei, L., & Savarese, S. (2016). Social LSTM: Human trajectory prediction in crowded spaces. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 961-971).

8. Gupta, A., Johnson, J., Fei-Fei, L., Savarese, S., & Alahi, A. (2018). Social GAN: Socially acceptable trajectories with generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 2255-2264).

9. Salzmann, T., Ivanovic, B., Chakravarty, P., & Pavone, M. (2020). Trajectron++: Dynamically-feasible trajectory forecasting with heterogeneous data. In Computer Vision – ECCV 2020 (pp. 683-700). Springer.

10. Liang, M., Yang, B., Hu, R., Chen, Y., Liao, R., Feng, S., & Urtasun, R. (2020). Learning lane graph representations for motion forecasting. In Computer Vision – ECCV 2020 (pp. 541-556). Springer.

11. Zhao, H., Gao, J., Lan, T., Sun, C., Sapp, B., Varadarajan, B., Shen, Y., Shen, Y., Chai, Y., Schmid, C., Li, C., & Anguelov, D. (2021). TNT: Target-driven trajectory prediction. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Robot Learning (pp. 895-904). PMLR.

12. Ngiam, J., Caine, B., Vasudevan, V., Zhang, Z., Chiang, H.-T. L., Ling, J., ... Anguelov, D. (2022). Scene transformer: A unified architecture for predicting future trajectories of multiple agents. In International Conference on Learning Representations.

13. Shi, S., Wang, Z., & Li, H. (2021). AgentFormer: Agent-aware transformers for socio-temporal multi-agent forecasting. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 9813-9823).

14. Zhou, Z., Ye, L., Wang, J., Wu, K., & Lu, K. (2022). HiVT: Hierarchical vector transformer for multi-agent motion prediction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 8823-8833).

15. Nayakanti, N., Al-Rfou, R., Zhou, A., Goel, K., Refaat, K. S., & Sapp, B. (2023). Wayformer: Motion forecasting via simple and efficient attention networks. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 2980-2987). IEEE.

16. Yang, R., Xu, Y., Fu, Y., & Su, L. (2026). Den-tp: A density-balanced data curation and evaluation framework for trajectory prediction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 10632-10641).

17. Caesar, H., Bankiti, V., Lang, A. H., Vora, S., Liong, V. E., Xu, Q., ... Beijbom, O. (2020). nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 11621-11631).

18. Chang, M.-F., Lambert, J., Sangkloy, P., Singh, J., Bak, S., Hartnett, A., ... Hays, J. (2019). Argoverse: 3D tracking and forecasting with rich maps. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 8748-8757).

19. Ettinger, S., Cheng, S., Caine, B., Liu, C., Zhao, H., Pradhan, S., ... Anguelov, D. (2021). Large scale interactive motion forecasting for autonomous driving: The Waymo open motion dataset. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 9710-9719).

20. Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 610-623).

Downloads

Published

2026-07-04

How to Cite

Self-Supervised Representation Learning for Large-Scale Vehicle Motion Prediction. (2026). International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Engineering and Systems, 1(2). https://ijaies.org/index.php/home/article/view/178