Machine Learning-Enabled Fault Detection in High-Speed Fiber-Optic Networks

Authors

  • Jyrki Aro Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA. Author
  • Torquato Majewski Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA. Author
  • Merche Carbajo School of Computing, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA. Author

Keywords:

machine learning; fault detection; fiber-optic networks; optical telemetry; network resilience; interpretability; infrastructure governance; sustainability

Abstract

High-speed fiber-optic networks constitute the backbone of contemporary digital society, supporting cloud computing, financial settlement, scientific collaboration, mobile backhaul, and increasingly time-critical industrial applications. As transmission rates rise and optical infrastructure becomes more complex, fault detection can no longer rely solely on threshold alarms, periodic testing, or operator experience. Machine learning offers a pathway toward earlier, more granular, and more context-aware identification of degradation, misconfiguration, and physical-layer anomalies. This paper examines machine learning-enabled fault detection in high-speed fiber-optic networks from a system-level perspective. It analyzes the architectural conditions that shape optical faults, the telemetry and sensing infrastructure required for data-driven monitoring, and the trade-offs among detection accuracy, inference latency, interpretability, deployment cost, and operational trust. The discussion emphasizes that fault detection is not merely a model-selection problem but a socio-technical challenge involving governance, workforce capacity, vendor interoperability, sustainability, and equitable access to resilient infrastructure. Through cross-domain comparisons with cloud anomaly detection, power-grid monitoring, and industrial predictive maintenance, the paper argues that successful deployment depends on aligning machine learning pipelines with optical-layer realities, institutional incentives, and public-interest obligations. It concludes with a forward-looking research agenda focused on robust multimodal sensing, uncertainty-aware diagnosis, human-in-the-loop operations, and policy frameworks that treat network resilience as critical infrastructure.

References

1. Agrawal, G. P. (2021). Fiber-optic communication systems (5th ed.). Wiley.

2. Cisco. (2020). Cisco annual internet report (2018–2023) white paper. Cisco.

3. ITU-T. (2020). G.694.1: Spectral grids for WDM applications: DWDM frequency grid. International Telecommunication Union.

4. Essiambre, R.-J., Kramer, G., Winzer, P. J., Foschini, G. J., & Goebel, B. (2010). Capacity limits of optical fiber networks. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 28(4), 662–701.

5. Winzer, P. J., & Essiambre, R.-J. (2006). Advanced optical modulation formats. Proceedings of the IEEE, 94(5), 952–985.

6. Poggiolini, P. (2012). The GN model of non-linear propagation in uncompensated coherent optical systems. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 30(24), 3857–3879.

7. Kilper, D. C., Atkinson, G., Korotky, S. K., Goyal, P., Vetter, P., Suvakovic, D., & Blouza, A. (2011). Power trends in communication networks. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 17(2), 275–284.

8. Vasseur, J. P., & Pickavet, M. (2008). Network recovery: Protection and restoration of optical, SONET-SDH, IP, and MPLS. Morgan Kaufmann.

9. Mukherjee, B. (2006). Optical WDM networks. Springer.

10. Fawaz, H. I., Forestier, G., Weber, J., Idoumghar, L., & Muller, P.-A. (2019). Deep learning for time series classification: A review. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 33(4), 917–963.

11. Musumeci, F., Rottondi, C., Nag, A., Macaluso, I., Zibar, D., Ruffini, M., & Tornatore, M. (2019). An overview on application of machine learning techniques in optical networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 21(2), 1383–1408.

12. Mata, J., de Miguel, I., Durán, R. J., Merayo, N., Singh, S. K., Jukan, A., & Chamania, M. (2018). Artificial intelligence (AI) methods in optical networks: A comprehensive survey. Optical Switching and Networking, 28, 43–57.

13. Saif, W. S., Esmail, M. A., Ragheb, A. M., Alshawi, T. A., & Alshebeili, S. A. (2021). Machine learning techniques for optical performance monitoring and modulation format identification: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 23(4), 2272–2304.

14. Rottondi, C., Barletta, L., Giusti, A., & Tornatore, M. (2018). Machine-learning method for quality of transmission prediction of unestablished lightpaths. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 10(2), A286–A297.

15. Zhou, Z., Wei, J., Luo, Y., Clark, K. A., Sillekens, E., Deakin, C., ... & Liu, Z. (2023). Communications with guaranteed bandwidth and low latency using frequency-referenced multiplexing. Nature Electronics, 6(9), 694-702.

16. Zibar, D., Piels, M., Jones, R., & Schäffer, C. G. (2016). Machine learning concepts in optical communication. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 34(6), 1446–1457.

17. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32.

18. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444.

19. Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), 206–215.

20. Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-02

How to Cite

Machine Learning-Enabled Fault Detection in High-Speed Fiber-Optic Networks. (2026). International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Engineering and Systems, 1(2). https://ijaies.org/index.php/home/article/view/171