Attention-Based Neural Networks for Cross-Asset Risk Prediction

Authors

  • Bertrand Goncalves Department of Computer Science, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA. Author

Keywords:

attention mechanisms, cross-asset risk, systemic risk, financial infrastructure, model governance, robustness, fairness, sustainability, AI regulation

Abstract

Cross-asset risk prediction has become a central challenge for financial institutions, regulators, and market infrastructures because modern portfolios are exposed to interconnected shocks that move across equities, fixed income, currencies, commodities, and digital assets. This paper examines attention-based neural networks as a system-level architecture for cross-asset risk prediction. Rather than treating attention merely as a predictive technique, the discussion positions it within broader questions of data infrastructure, model governance, robustness, fairness, sustainability, and policy. Attention mechanisms offer advantages for cross-asset settings because they can dynamically weight heterogeneous signals, learn time-varying dependencies, and integrate market microstructure, macroeconomic, and network-based features. However, their deployment also raises concerns about interpretability, regime sensitivity, computational cost, and the concentration of model risk in a small number of opaque platforms. The paper argues that effective cross-asset risk prediction requires a socio-technical design in which attention models are coupled with governance routines, stress-testing protocols, human oversight, and regulatory reporting standards. It reviews architectural trade-offs, data and feature engineering issues, systemic risk implications, deployment constraints, and evaluation practices. It also considers cross-domain lessons from high-frequency trading, network risk measurement, and AI assurance frameworks. The conclusion is that attention-based systems can strengthen cross-asset risk intelligence only if they are embedded in resilient infrastructures and accountable institutional processes. Predictive accuracy alone is insufficient; legitimacy, contestability, and operational sustainability are equally important for systems that inform capital allocation, margin setting, and prudential supervision.

References

1. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 5998–6008.

2. Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2015). Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.0473

3. Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780.

4. Fischer, T., & Krauss, C. (2018). Deep learning with long short-term memory networks for financial market predictions. European Journal of Operational Research, 270(2), 654–669.

5. Sirignano, J., & Cont, R. (2019). Universal features of price formation in financial markets: Perspectives from deep learning. Quantitative Finance, 19(9), 1449–1459.

6. Zhang, Z., Zohren, S., & Roberts, S. (2020). Deep learning for portfolio optimization. The Journal of Financial Data Science, 2(4), 8–20.

7. López de Prado, M. (2018). Advances in financial machine learning. Wiley.

8. Hull, J. C. (2018). Risk management and financial institutions (5th ed.). Wiley.

9. McNeil, A. J., Frey, R., & Embrechts, P. (2015). Quantitative risk management: Concepts, techniques and tools (Revised ed.). Princeton University Press.

10. Liu, T. (2026). Trust-Calibrated Multi-Agent Decision Intelligence for Financial Risk Management under Market Regime Shifts. Available at SSRN 7307503.

11. Bouchaud, J.-P., Farmer, J. D., & Lillo, F. (2009). How markets slowly digest changes in supply and demand. In T. Hens & K. R. Schenk-Hoppé (Eds.), Handbook of financial markets: Dynamics and evolution (pp. 57–160). North-Holland.

12. Cont, R. (2001). Empirical properties of asset returns: Stylized facts and statistical issues. Quantitative Finance, 1(2), 223–236.

13. Diebold, F. X., & Yılmaz, K. (2014). On the network topology of variance decompositions: Measuring the connectedness of financial firms. Journal of Econometrics, 182(1), 119–134.

14. Barigozzi, M., & Brownlees, C. (2019). NETS: Network estimation for time series. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 34(3), 347–364.

15. Billio, M., Getmansky, M., Lo, A. W., & Pelizzon, L. (2012). Econometric measures of connectedness and systemic risk in the finance and insurance sectors. Journal of Financial Economics, 104(3), 535–559.

16. Acemoglu, D., Ozdaglar, A., & Tahbaz-Salehi, A. (2015). Systemic risk and stability in financial networks. American Economic Review, 105(2), 564–608.

17. Khandani, A. E., & Lo, A. W. (2011). What happened to the quants in August 2007? Evidence from factors and transactions data. Journal of Financial Markets, 14(1), 1–46.

18. Kirilenko, A., Kyle, A. S., Samadi, M., & Tuzun, T. (2017). The Flash Crash: High-frequency trading in an electronic market. Journal of Finance, 72(3), 967–998.

19. Barocas, S., Hardt, M., & Narayanan, A. (2023). Fairness and machine learning: Limitations and opportunities. MIT Press.

20. Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L., Hutchinson, B., Spitzer, E., Raji, I. D., & Gebru, T. (2019). Model cards for model reporting. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 220–229.

21. Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Daumé III, H., & Crawford, K. (2021). Datasheets for datasets. Communications of the ACM, 64(12), 86–92.

22. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0). NIST AI 100-1. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1

23. Financial Stability Board. (2017). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in financial services: Market developments and financial stability implications. Financial Stability Board.

24. Bank for International Settlements. (2021). Regulating big techs in finance. BIS Bulletin No. 45. Bank for International Settlements.

25. OECD. (2021). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. OECD/LEGAL/0449. OECD Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-21

How to Cite

Attention-Based Neural Networks for Cross-Asset Risk Prediction. (2026). International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Engineering and Systems, 1(2). https://ijaies.org/index.php/home/article/view/162