Artificial Intelligence for Composition–Structure–Property Optimization of Ferroelectric Ceramics

Authors

  • Laszlo Jopich Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA. Author

Keywords:

ferroelectric ceramics; materials informatics; composition–structure–property relationships; Bayesian optimization; autonomous experimentation; governance; sustainability

Abstract

Ferroelectric ceramics occupy a critical position in modern electronics, sensing, actuation, energy storage, and electromechanical transduction, yet their development remains constrained by complex coupling among chemical composition, crystallographic structure, microstructure, processing history, and functional property response. Artificial intelligence offers a powerful means to navigate this high-dimensional design space, but its effective use requires more than isolated predictive models. It demands integrated computational, experimental, data, and governance architectures that can support reproducible discovery, deployment, and lifecycle management. This paper examines artificial intelligence for composition–structure–property optimization of ferroelectric ceramics from a system-level perspective. It argues that progress depends on aligning machine learning architectures with physical priors, multi-fidelity characterization, automated experimentation, and robust data infrastructure. The discussion considers structural trade-offs among accuracy, interpretability, throughput, cost, and sustainability, as well as the institutional arrangements needed to ensure fairness, reproducibility, and policy coherence. Case illustrations include perovskite ferroelectrics, barium titanate-based dielectrics, lead-free piezoelectric systems, and multilayer ceramic capacitor manufacturing. The paper concludes that artificial intelligence can accelerate ferroelectric ceramic design only when treated as a socio-technical capability embedded in material science infrastructure rather than as a standalone algorithmic substitute for domain expertise. Such an approach can improve discovery outcomes while preserving scientific accountability and enabling responsible deployment.

References

1. Ramprasad, R., Batra, R., Pilania, G., Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A., & Kim, C. (2017). Machine learning in materials informatics: Recent applications and prospects. npj Computational Materials, 3, 54.

2. Butler, K. T., Davies, D. W., Cartwright, H., Isayev, O., & Walsh, A. (2018). Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature, 559(7715), 547–555.

3. Sanchez-Lengeling, B., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2018). Inverse molecular design using machine learning: Generative models for matter engineering. Science, 361(6400), 360–365.

4. Batra, R., Song, L., & Ramprasad, R. (2020). Emerging materials intelligence ecosystems accelerated by virtual screening. Nature Reviews Materials, 5(9), 655–678.

5. Schmidt, J., Marques, M. R. G., Botti, S., & Marques, M. A. L. (2019). Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science. npj Computational Materials, 5, 83.

6. Lookman, T., Balachandran, P. V., Xue, D., & Yuan, R. (2019). Active learning in materials science with emphasis on adaptive sampling using uncertainties for targeted design. npj Computational Materials, 5, 21.

7. Xue, D., Balachandran, P. V., Hogden, J., Theiler, J., Xue, D., & Lookman, T. (2016). Accelerated search for materials with targeted properties by adaptive design. Nature Communications, 7, 11241.

8. Raccuglia, P., Elbert, K. C., Adler, P. D., Falk, C., Wenny, M. B., Mollo, A., Zeller, M., Friedler, S. A., Schrier, J., & Norquist, A. J. (2016). Machine-learning-assisted materials discovery using failed experiments. Nature, 533(7601), 73–76.

9. Balachandran, P. V., Kowalski, B., Sehirlioglu, A., & Lookman, T. (2018). Experimental search for high-temperature ferroelectric perovskites guided by two-step machine learning. Nature Communications, 9, 1668.

10. Yuan, R., Liu, Z., Balachandran, P. V., Xue, D., Zhou, Y., Ding, X., Sun, J., Xue, D., & Lookman, T. (2018). Accelerated discovery of large electrostrains in BaTiO3-based piezoelectrics using active learning. Advanced Materials, 30(7), 1702884.

11. Cohn, D. A., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1996). Active learning with statistical models. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 4, 129–145.

12. Shahriari, B., Swersky, K., Wang, Z., Adams, R. P., & de Freitas, N. (2016). Taking the human out of the loop: A review of Bayesian optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE, 104(1), 148–175.

13. Luan, Saiwei, et al. "Fabrication of High Performance BaTiO3 Films via Aqueous Tape Casting for ultrathin MLCC applications." Ceramics International (2025).

14. Zhang, Y., & Ling, C. (2018). A strategy to apply machine learning to small datasets in materials science. npj Computational Materials, 4, 25.

15. Pilania, G., Wang, C., Jiang, X., Rajasekaran, S., & Ramprasad, R. (2013). Accelerating materials property predictions using machine learning. Scientific Reports, 3, 2810.

16. Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A., Pilania, G., Huan, T. D., Lookman, T., & Ramprasad, R. (2016). Machine learning strategy for accelerated design of polymer dielectrics. Scientific Reports, 6, 20952.

17. Meredig, B., Agrawal, A., Kirklin, S., Saal, J. E., Doak, J. W., Thompson, A., Zhang, K., Choudhary, A., & Wolverton, C. (2014). Combinatorial screening for new materials in unconstrained composition space with machine learning. Physical Review B, 89(9), 094104.

18. Seko, A., Togo, A., Hayashi, H., Tsuda, K., Chaput, L., & Tanaka, I. (2015). Prediction of low-thermal-conductivity compounds with first-principles anharmonic lattice-dynamics calculations and Bayesian optimization. Physical Review Letters, 115(20), 205901.

19. Sculley, D., Holt, G., Golovin, D., Davydov, E., Phillips, T., Ebner, D., Chaudhary, V., Young, M., Crespo, J.-F., & Dennison, D. (2015). Hidden technical debt in machine learning systems. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 28, 2503–2511.

20. Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L., Hutchinson, B., Spitzer, E., Raji, I. D., & Gebru, T. (2019). Model cards for model reporting. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 220–229.

21. Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., Daumé III, H., & Crawford, K. (2021). Datasheets for datasets. Communications of the ACM, 64(12), 86–92.

22. Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., ... Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-02

How to Cite

Artificial Intelligence for Composition–Structure–Property Optimization of Ferroelectric Ceramics. (2026). International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Engineering and Systems, 1(2). https://ijaies.org/index.php/home/article/view/161