Graph Neural Networks for User Preference Prediction in Multi-Domain Recommendation Systems

Authors

  • Uday D. Yadav School of Computing, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA. Author
  • Olivier Terry Department of Computer Science, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA. Author
  • Harish Tandon Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA. Author

Keywords:

graph neural networks; multi-domain recommendation; user preference modeling; recommendation infrastructure; fairness; data governance

Abstract

Multi-domain recommendation systems must reconcile heterogeneous user interaction traces, item catalogs, contextual signals, and business constraints within a coherent infrastructure. This paper presents a system-level examination of graph neural networks for user preference prediction across domains. Rather than focusing on isolated model accuracy, the discussion addresses how relational inductive biases enable unified representations of users, items, attributes, contexts, and cross-domain transitions. The paper examines architectural choices for message passing over large-scale heterogeneous graphs, the incorporation of categorical and context-aware query signals, and the implications of multi-domain data sharing for privacy, governance, and operational stability. It further analyzes structural trade-offs in balancing domain-specific specialization with shared preference knowledge, the allocation of computational resources in continuous training pipelines, and the management of concept drift across catalogs with different temporal dynamics. Fairness and robustness receive particular attention because multi-domain graphs may propagate bias through cross-domain edges and create feedback loops that affect downstream user exposure. The paper also considers sustainability through sampling strategies, sparsified propagation, and lifecycle-aware system design. The conclusion identifies open challenges for future research, including cross-domain causal identification, federated graph learning, and accountable personalization governance. Overall, the paper argues that graph neural networks offer a promising systemic foundation for multi-domain recommendation but require careful architectural, infrastructural, and policy-level design to realize their benefits responsibly.

References

1. van den Berg, R., Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2017). Graph convolutional matrix completion. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.02263.

2. Hamilton, W. L., Ying, R., & Leskovec, J. (2017). Inductive representation learning on large graphs. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 1024–1034).

3. Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2017). Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.

4. Veličković, P., Cucurull, G., Casanova, A., Romero, A., Liò, P., & Bengio, Y. (2018). Graph attention networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.

5. Wu, Z., Pan, S., Chen, F., Long, G., Zhang, C., & Yu, P. S. (2021). A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 32(1), 4–24.

6. Ying, R., He, R., Chen, K., Eksombatchai, P., Hamilton, W. L., & Leskovec, J. (2018). Graph convolutional neural networks for web-scale recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (pp. 974–983).

7. He, X., Deng, K., Wang, X., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., & Wang, M. (2020). LightGCN: Simplifying and powering graph convolution network for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 639–648).

8. Wang, X., He, X., Cao, Y., Liu, M., & Chua, T.-S. (2019). KGAT: Knowledge graph attention network for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (pp. 950–958).

9. Fan, W., Ma, Y., Li, Q., He, Y., Zhao, E., Tang, J., & Yin, D. (2019). Graph neural networks for social recommendation. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference (pp. 417–426).

10. Jin, B., Gao, C., He, X., Jin, D., & Li, Y. (2020). Multi-behavior recommendation with graph convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 659–668).

11. Zhu, F., Wang, Y., Chen, C., Zhou, J., Li, L., & Liu, G. (2021). Cross-domain recommendation: challenges, progress and prospects. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.01696.

12. Yu, X. (2026, January). AI-Driven Personalization across Domains for Local Categorical Query Understanding and Context-Aware Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Digital Media Technology and Social Computing (pp. 77-82).

13. Xu, K., Hu, W., Leskovec, J., & Jegelka, S. (2019). How powerful are graph neural networks? In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.

14. Wang, X., He, X., Wang, M., Feng, F., & Chua, T.-S. (2019). Neural graph collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 165–174).

15. Wang, X., Jin, H., Zhang, A., He, X., Xu, T., & Chua, T.-S. (2020). Disentangled graph collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 1001–1010).

16. Yang, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, T., & Tong, Y. (2019). Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 10(2), 1–19.

17. Sculley, D., Holt, G., Golovin, D., Davydov, E., Phillips, T., Ebner, D., Chaudhary, V., Young, M., Crespo, J.-F., & Dennison, D. (2015). Hidden technical debt in machine learning systems. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 2503–2511).

18. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35.

19. Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2016). Big data's disparate impact. California Law Review, 104(3), 671–732.

20. Kusner, M. J., Loftus, J., Russell, C., & Silva, R. (2017). Counterfactual fairness. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 4066–4076).

21. Dai, E., & Wang, S. (2021). Say no to the discrimination: Learning fair graph neural networks with limited sensitive attribute information. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (pp. 680–688).

22. He, X., He, Z., Du, X., & Chua, T.-S. (2018). Adversarial personalized ranking for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 355–364).

23. Gama, J., Žliobaitė, I., Bifet, A., Pechenizkiy, M., & Bouchachia, A. (2014). A survey on concept drift adaptation. ACM Computing Surveys, 46(4), 1–37.

24. Zhang, Y., & Chen, X. (2020). Explainable recommendation: A survey and new perspectives. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 14(1), 1–101.

25. Chiang, W.-L., Liu, X., Si, S., Li, Y., Bengio, S., & Hsieh, C.-J. (2019). Cluster-GCN: An efficient algorithm for training deep and large graph convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (pp. 257–266).

Downloads

Published

2026-08-14

How to Cite

Graph Neural Networks for User Preference Prediction in Multi-Domain Recommendation Systems. (2026). International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Engineering and Systems, 1(1). https://ijaies.org/index.php/home/article/view/153