Conversational Recommendation with Long-Term User Memory for Personalized Travel Planning
Keywords:
conversational recommendation; long-term user memory; travel planning; personalization; dialogue systems; system architecture; governance; fairness; sustainabilityAbstract
Travel planning is a complex decision process characterized by interdependent choices, heterogeneous constraints, and deeply personal preferences that evolve over time. Conversational recommender systems have become a promising paradigm for interactive travel assistance because they support iterative preference elicitation, clarification, and explanation in natural language. However, many existing conversational recommenders are designed as session-bound systems that treat each dialogue as an isolated episode. This paper argues that effective personalized travel planning requires the integration of long-term user memory across sessions, enabling the system to maintain stable preferences, contextual constraints, and interaction histories while adapting to changing user circumstances. The paper examines the architectural foundations of memory-augmented conversational recommendation, including modular dialogue management, memory encoding and retrieval, and recommendation policy design. It presents a system-level analysis of structural trade-offs related to scalability, latency, robustness, privacy, fairness, and sustainability. The discussion emphasizes the need to balance recommendation quality with user autonomy, data governance, and computational cost. Travel planning is used as a representative domain because it exposes the tensions between personalization and persistent user modeling, between rich contextual inference and data minimization, and between model capability and operational efficiency. The paper concludes by outlining future research directions for longitudinal evaluation, adaptive forgetting, federated memory architectures, and governance mechanisms that can support trustworthy long-term user memory in conversational recommender systems.
References
1. Jannach, D., Manzoor, A., Cai, W., & Chen, L. (2021). A survey on conversational recommender systems. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(5), Article 105. https://doi.org/10.1145/3453154
2. Gao, C., Lei, W., He, X., de Rijke, M., & Chua, T.-S. (2021). Advances and challenges in conversational recommender systems: A survey. AI Open, 2, 100–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.06.002
3. Christakopoulou, K., Radlinski, F., & Hofmann, K. (2016). Towards conversational recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 815–824). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939746
4. Sun, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Conversational recommender system. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 235–244). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209978.3210002
5. Zhang, S., Yao, L., Sun, A., & Tay, Y. (2019). Deep learning based recommender system: A survey and new perspectives. ACM Computing Surveys, 52(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3285029
6. Ricci, F., Rokach, L., & Shapira, B. (2015). Recommender systems: Introduction and challenges. In F. Ricci, L. Rokach, & B. Shapira (Eds.), Recommender systems handbook (2nd ed., pp. 1–34). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_1
7. Koren, Y., Bell, R., & Volinsky, C. (2009). Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer, 42(8), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2009.263
8. Hidasi, B., Karatzoglou, A., Baltrunas, L., & Tikk, D. (2016). Session-based recommendations with recurrent neural networks. In 4th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.06939
9. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (pp. 5998–6008). Curran Associates. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762
10. Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) (pp. 4171–4186). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423
11. Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D., & Sutskever, I. (2019). Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI Technical Report. https://openai.com/research/better-language-models
12. Zhou, K., Zhao, W. X., Bian, S., Zhou, Y., Wen, J.-R., & Yu, J. (2020). Improving conversational recommender systems via knowledge graph based semantic fusion. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 1006–1014). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3394486.3403143
13. Chen, Q., Lin, J., Zhang, Y., Ding, M., Cen, Y., Yang, H., & Tang, J. (2019). Towards knowledge-based recommender dialog system. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (pp. 1803–1813). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-1189
14. Wu, C., Wang, Y., Ma, W., Zhang, W., Chen, Y., & Wang, X. (2022). A survey on conversational search and recommendation: Datasets, methods, and opportunities. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 40(4), Article 77. https://doi.org/10.1145/3502870
15. Ren, Z., Tian, Z., Li, D., Ren, P., Yang, L., Xin, X., Liang, H., de Rijke, M., & Chen, Z. (2021). Variational reasoning about user preferences for conversational recommendation. In Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 165–175). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3404835.3462853
16. Zhang, Y., Chen, X., Ai, Q., Yang, L., & Croft, W. B. (2018). TowardsZhang, Y., Chen, X., Ai, Q., Yang, L., & Croft, W. B. (2018). Towards conversational search and recommendation: System ask, user respond. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM '18) (pp. 177–186). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3269206.3271776
17. Li, R., Ebrahimi Kahou, S., Schulz, H., Michalski, V., Charlin, L., & Pal, C. (2018). Towards deep conversational recommendations. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 (NeurIPS 2018) (pp. 9725–9735). Curran Associates. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2018/hash/1f2b325dcdaf12a68ed498273206d263-Abstract.html
18. Yu, X. (2026). Enhancing Search Efficiency through LLM-Based User Memory Systems for Query Matching and Intent Modeling.
19. Mehrotra, R., McInerney, J., Bouchard, H., Lalmas, M., & Diaz, F. (2018). Towards a fair marketplace: Counterfactual evaluation of the trade-off between relevance, fairness & satisfaction in recommendation systems. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM '18) (pp. 2243–2251). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3269206.3272027
20. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union, L119, 1–88. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
21. Selbst, A. D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S. A., Venkatasubramanian, S., & Vertesi, J. (2019). Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT '19) (pp. 59–68). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287598
22. Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '21) (pp. 610–623). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
23. Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019). Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 3645–3650). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1355
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Engineering and Systems

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.