Data-Driven Differential Invariant Learning for Intelligent Fault Diagnosis and Remaining Useful Life Prediction in Industrial Systems

Authors

  • Neah Gearratt Department of Computer Science, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA. Author
  • Martin D. Lawson School of Information Technology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA. Author
  • Grant Garrett Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. Author

Keywords:

differential invariants, intelligent fault diagnosis, remaining useful life prediction, system architecture, industrial AI, robustness, data governance, fairness, sustainability

Abstract

The increasing complexity of industrial systems and the proliferation of sensor data have driven a paradigm shift toward data-driven intelligent fault diagnosis and remaining useful life prediction. However, current deep learning-based approaches often suffer from brittle generalization when deployment conditions diverge from training distributions, undermining trust in safety-critical applications. This paper investigates the integration of differential invariant learning into industrial diagnostic and prognostic frameworks as a systemic strategy to address these vulnerabilities. Differential invariants, which capture intrinsic symmetries of physical processes, offer a principled route to extract features that remain stable across varying operating regimes, sensor configurations, and environmental conditions. We present a system-level analysis that situates data-driven invariant discovery within the broader architecture of industrial cyber-physical systems, examining structural trade-offs between model expressiveness, interpretability, and robustness. The discussion spans the entire lifecycle: from data governance and modular architectural design to deployment in edge-cloud hierarchies, continuous monitoring, and fairness-aware operation. We articulate how invariant representations can be embedded in federated learning pipelines to preserve privacy while enabling knowledge sharing across heterogeneous fleets. Furthermore, we explore the policy implications of deploying self-adaptive invariant-based systems, including certification, accountability, and equitable maintenance scheduling. By synthesizing insights from differential geometry, nonlinear dynamics, and socio-technical systems research, this paper provides a comprehensive roadmap for building trustworthy, sustainable, and resilient intelligent maintenance infrastructures. The analysis refrains from mathematical formalism, instead concentrating on conceptual foundations, structural design principles, and the governance frameworks necessary to transition invariant learning from laboratory demonstrations to operational industrial services.

References

1. Lei, Y., Yang, B., Jiang, X., Jia, F., Li, N., & Nandi, A. K. (2020). Applications of machine learning to machine fault diagnosis: A review and roadmap. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 138, 106587.

2. Zhang, W., Peng, G., Li, C., Chen, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2018). A deep convolutional neural network with new training methods for bearing fault diagnosis under noisy environment and different working load. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 100, 439–453.

3. Li, X., Ding, Q., & Sun, J.-Q. (2018). Remaining useful life estimation in prognostics using deep convolution neural networks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 172, 1–11.

4. Ganin, Y., & Lempitsky, V. (2015). Unsupervised domain adaptation by backpropagation. In International conference on machine learning (pp. 1180–1189). PMLR.

5. Lu, W., Liang, B., Cheng, Y., Meng, D., Yang, J., & Zhang, T. (2017). Deep model based domain adaptation for fault diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 64(3), 2296–2305.

6. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016). Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 770–778).

7. Arjovsky, M., Bottou, L., Gulrajani, I., & Lopez-Paz, D. (2019). Invariant risk minimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.02893.

8. Cohen, T., & Welling, M. (2016). Group equivariant convolutional networks. In International conference on machine learning (pp. 2990–2999). PMLR.

9. Olver, P. J. (1995). Equivalence, invariants, and symmetry. Cambridge University Press.

10. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019). Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686–707.

11. Chen, R. T. Q., Rubanova, Y., Bettencourt, J., & Duvenaud, D. K. (2018). Neural ordinary differential equations. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 6571–6583).

12. Brunton, S. L., Proctor, J. L., & Kutz, J. N. (2016). Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(15), 3932–3937.

13. Yang, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, T., & Tong, Y. (2019). Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 10(2), 1–19.

14. Montavon, G., Samek, W., & Müller, K.-R. (2018). Methods for interpreting and understanding deep neural networks. Digital Signal Processing, 73, 1–15.

15. Tao, F., Zhang, H., Liu, A., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2019). Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15(4), 2405–2415.

16. Hu, L., Li, Y., & Lin, Z. (2025). Governing equation discovery from data based on differential invariants. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18798.

17. Goodfellow, I. J., Shlens, J., & Szegedy, C. (2015). Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6572.

18. Shokri, R., Stronati, M., Song, C., & Shmatikov, V. (2017). Membership inference attacks against machine learning models. In 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) (pp. 3–18). IEEE.

19. Schwartz, R., Dodge, J., Smith, N. A., & Etzioni, O. (2020). Green AI. Communications of the ACM, 63(12), 54–63.

20. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-07

How to Cite

Data-Driven Differential Invariant Learning for Intelligent Fault Diagnosis and Remaining Useful Life Prediction in Industrial Systems. (2026). International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Engineering and Systems, 1(2). https://ijaies.org/index.php/home/article/view/109